Entangled Knowledge
- Marie Aimee Juru

- Jun 17
- 2 min read
Updated: Sep 1

A few months ago, an idea surfaced while I was listening to a book about synchronicities, the double-slit experiment, quantum physics, and the whole relationship between particles. Once connected, they can communicate from a distance if they're vibrating on the same resonance, even through seperation.
Then it got me thinking about sociology and psychology, which I studied and will continue to study, because many of these scientific and metaphysical theories are similar to sociological theories, including looking at how the outer world shapes our behavior, how we perceive ourselves, how we perceive others, and the decisions that we make. Contrarily, psychology looks at the inner world and it's influence on our behavior, communication tools and preferences, and our whole mental design.
The overlap across all arts and sciences, in some cases a perfect match, never left my mind. It got me imagining how a psychology professor can add much value in other departments, similar to how a geography seminar could spark interesting debates among philosophy students. We're not that different. We're asking very similar questions and we're coming to similar findings. We're just studying a different aspect of life. Think about the 42 arts and sciences that were once the foundation of Kemetic education. Surely when each of those disciplines is studied with integrity, to a deep enough level, with pure intention to truly understand rather than to control or manipulate, wouldn't they all eventually arrive at similar conclusions? That everything is connected. That everything has a purpose. That nothing exists in isolation, and every element is in relationship to something else.

Even in college, when we're taught how to write research papers, we’re being trained to do this. We're taught to synthesize multiple sources into a paragraph. We take quotes from different authors, sometimes with opposing arguments, and fit them harmoniously into a single stream of thought. We're graded on showcasing the relationship between ideas, whether they agree or disagree, whether they attract or repel. We’re not told to resolve the tension, we’re told to highlight the connection. That's unity in polarity. I can't speak for others, but this how I've come to understand life these past years. Why don’t we look at knowledge and people this way all the time?
All of these disciplines are different doors to the same house. Some people enter through science. Some through art. Some through spirit. Some through body. But once you’re in, you start to realize; we were never in separate rooms. Just speaking different languages for the same truths.








Comments